Archives

All posts for the month April, 2013

Bayes’ Formula is frequently presented in statistics texts as important (it is), profound (it isn’t, particularly), and difficult (it isn’t, remotely).  If you understand conditional probability, then Bayes’ Formula is trivial.  Let me show you: We start with the probability of two events, A and B: \[P(AB)\ =\ P(A|B)\ ×\ P(B)\] Similarly, for the probability […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level I Quantitative Methods Membership, CFA® Level I Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.

Pricing derivatives – forwards, futures, FRAs, and swaps – is generally not difficult, and the principle that underlies all pricing relationships is quite easy: arbitrage.

The first thing you need to know is exactly what is meant by the price of a derivative. The price of:

  • A forward/futures contract is the agreed price of the underlying at the expiration of the contract
  • An FRA is the agreed fixed rate
  • A swap is the agreed fixed rate (note that in a fixed-for-fixed currency swap there are two prices, and in a floating-for-floating currency swap or a floating-for-equity swap there is no price)

Here are links to articles on pricing derivatives:

Also note that the formulae used for pricing derivatives will vary depending on whether the risk-free interest rate is given as an effective rate or a nominal rate; for a refresher on nominal vs. effective interest rates, look here.

An FRA is essentially an agreement to enter into two loans (one long, one short) in the future: a fixed-rate loan and a floating-rate loan.  (The difference between an FRA and an actual agreement to enter into these two loans is that the FRA will be settled at the beginning of the loan period, whereas the loans would be settled at the end).  Specifically, an m × n FRA is an agreement to enter into two (nm)-month loans starting m months from today; i.e., the loan period starts m months from today and ends n months from today.  For there to be no arbitrage opportunity, the price of an FRA, which is the agreed fixed rate, has to be the (nm)-month forward rate starting m months from today; it’s the forward rate implied by the current spot rates for the expiration of the m × n FRA and the expiration of the underlying loans:

\[r_{fixed}\ =\ \left[ \frac{1\ +\ \left(S_n\dfrac{n\ ×\ 30}{360}\right)}{1\ +\ \left(S_m\dfrac{m\ ×\ 30}{360}\right)}\ -\ 1\right]\left[\frac{360}{\left(n\ –\ m\right)30}\right]\]

where:

  • \(r_{fixed}\): fixed rate on FRA
  • \(S_m\): m-month (LIBOR) spot rate
  • \(S_n\): n-month (LIBOR) spot rate

Note that the formula above assumes that the rates are nominal rates, such as LIBOR.

For example, suppose that the 4-month (120-day) spot rate is 3%, and the 7-month (210-day) spot rate is 5%.  Then the fixed rate on a 4 × 7 FRA – the 3-month (90-day) forward rate starting 4 months from now – would be:

\begin{align}_3f_4\ &=\ \left[\frac{1\ +\ \left(5\%\dfrac{7\ ×\ 30}{360}\right)}{1\ +\ \left(3\%\dfrac{4\ ×\ 30}{360}\right)}\ –\ 1\right]\left(\frac{360}{3\ ×\ 30}\right)\\
\\
&=\ 7.5908\%
\end{align}

(Look here if you need a refresher on calculating forward rates from spot rates.)  This can perhaps best be visualized on a timeline:

Pricing FRAs

(Note: the remainder of this article explains the arbitrage transactions that ensure that the price has to be calculated according to the formula above.  You can skip it if you care only what the formula is, not why it has to work.)

This (fixed) forward rate can be duplicated with fixed-rate bonds: being long the forward rate is equivalent to being long an n-month bond and short an m-month bond.  Thus, the equivalent of being long a 7.5908%, 3-month loan starting 4 months from now (i.e., lending the money, and receiving the interest) is being short a 4-month, 3% bond (i.e., borrowing the money (issuing the bond) and paying the interest) and long a 7-month, 5% bond (i.e., lending the money (buying the bond) and receiving the interest). The par value on these bonds will be the present value of the loan starting in 4 months; the discount rate will be 3% (the 4-month spot rate). So, to duplicate a 3-month, $10,000,000 par, 7.5908% loan starting 4 months from now, you would sell a 4-month, 3% bond and buy a 7-month, 5% bond, each having a present value of:

\[\frac{$10,000,000}{1\ +\ \left(3\%\dfrac{4\ ×\ 30}{360}\right)}\ =\ $9,900,990\]

In 4 months, the payoff on the 4-month bond would be $10,000,000; to cover that, you will borrow $10,000,000 for 3 months at 7.5908%. At the end of that 3 months (7 months from today), you will have to repay the loan:

\[$10,000,000\left[1\ +\ \left(7.5908\%\frac{3\ ×\ 30}{360}\right)\right]\ =\ $10,189,769\]

However, at the end of 7 months you will be paid for the 7-month bond you bought today, and that payoff will be:

\[$9,900,990\left[1\ +\ \left(5\%\frac{7\ ×\ 30}{360}\right)\right]\ =\ $10,189,769\]

If the fixed rate on the FRA were anything other than the implied forward rate, an arbitrage opportunity would arise.  The series of transactions is a little complicated – more so than for forwards, futures, and swaps – but not too bad.

Suppose that the FRA price were too high: 8%, say. Then we want to receive the 8% fixed rate on the FRA and pay the 7.5908% forward rate. Here are the arbitrage transactions (assume that in 4 months the 3-month LIBOR rate turns out to be 6%; the number doesn’t matter – the resulting arbitrage profit will be the same if it’s 6% or 7.5908% or 9.2% or anything else – but having a specific number will make the calculations easier to follow):

Today

  • Sell a 7-month bond paying 5%, par value = $9,900,990
  • Buy a 4-month bond paying 3%, par value = $9,900,990
  • Enter into the short position (pay floating, receive fixed) on a $10,000,000 notional, 4 × 7 FRA, priced at 8%

Four months from today

  • Receive the payoff on the 4-month bond: $10,000,000
  • Buy a 3-month bond paying 6% (the current 3-month LIBOR rate), par value (and current price) = $10,000,000
  • Receive the payoff on the FRA:

\[\frac{$10,000,000\left(8\%\ -\ 6\%\right)\dfrac{90}{360}}{1\ +\ 6\%\left(\dfrac{90}{360}\right)}\ =\ \frac{$50,000}{1\ +\ 6\%\left(\dfrac{90}{360}\right)}\ =\ $49,261\]

  • Buy a 3-month bond paying 6%, par value (and current price) = $49,261

(Note: if the 3-month LIBOR rate were higher than 8%, the payoff on the FRA would be negative, and you would sell a 3-month bond instead of buying a 3-month bond.)

Seven months from today

  • Receive the payoff on the 3-month, $10,000,000 bond: $10,150,000 (= $10,000,000 × (1 + 6%/4))
  • Receive the payoff on the 3-month, $49,261 bond: $50,000 (the undiscounted FRA payoff)
  • Pay off the 7-month bond: $10,189,769
  • Arbitrage profit = $10,150,000 + $50,000 – $10,189,769 = $10,231

By buying the $10,000,000 bond at 6% you have neutralized the effect of the (previously unknown) market floating rate, and by buying the $49,261 bond at 6% you have effectively counteracted the discounting of the FRA payoff (which is why the actual LIBOR rate at the expiration of the FRA doesn’t matter), leaving only the (undiscounted) fixed rate.  The effect of these transactions will be receiving the (high) FRA fixed rate and paying the forward rate (at the end of the loan period):

\[$10,000,000\left(8\%\ -\ 7.5908\%\right)\frac{90}{360}\ =\ $10,231\]

(If the 3-month LIBOR rate in 4 month were, say, 7%, the net result will be the same.  The undiscounted payoff on the FRA would be $25,000, and the discounted payoff would be $24,570.  You would buy a $10,000,000 par, 3-month bond paying 7% and a $24,570 par, 3-month bond paying 7% (each priced at par), and your payoff in 3 months would be $10,175,000 + $25,000 = $10,200,000, which is the same as what you would get when the 3-month LIBOR rate is 6%.  As I stated, the 3-month LIBOR rate at the expiration of the FRA doesn’t matter; your profit is always the same amount.)

If the FRA price were too low, the arbitrage transactions would start (today) with:

  • Sell a 4-month bond paying 3%, par value = $9,900,990
  • Buy a 7-month bond paying 5%, par value = $9,900,990
  • Enter into the long position (pay fixed) on a $10,000,000 notional, 4 × 7 FRA

(I leave the remainder of the transactions to your imagination.)

Remember that the price of a forward/future contract is the agreed price of the underlying at the expiration of the contract, which has to be: \[F_T\ =\ S_0\left(1\ +\ r_f\right)^T\] where: \(T\): expiration of the forward/futures contract \(F_T\): forward/futures price of the underlying (at time \(T\)) \(S_0\): spot price of the underlying today \(r_f\): effective […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level II Derivatives Membership, CFA® Level II Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.

Remember that the price of a plain vanilla interest rate swap is the fixed rate on the swap. The key to pricing swaps is the realization that a swap is essentially an exchange of bonds.  A plain vanilla (fixed-for-floating) interest rate swap can be replicated by the fixed payer issuing a fixed-rate bond to the […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level II Derivatives Membership, CFA® Level II Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.

FRA is unquestionably one of the more difficult topic areas for Level I candidates, because it requires memorization of a lot of ideas, rather than developing those ideas from first principles.  There are, however, some ideas in FRA that can be developed from first principles, which will make them easier to recall on exam day.  […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level I Membership, CFA® Level I Financial Reporting and Analysis (FRA) Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.

The formulae for valuing all derivatives are essentially the same: \[Value\ =\ PV\left(what\ you\ will\ receive\right)\ –\ PV\left(what\ you\ will\ pay\right)\] The one valuing formula that needs some explanation is the formula for valuing a currency forward; it is slightly different from the other formulae, but the difference is never explained. Here goes: Given: \(V_t\): […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level II Derivatives Membership, CFA® Level II Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.

A common question that plagues many Level III candidates is how to treat inflation when calculating a nominal, before-tax required rate of return for an individual investor: do you add inflation to the real after-tax return, then compute the before-tax return, or do you start with the real after-tax return, compute the before-tax return, then […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level III Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.

The most important topic in Econ is marginal revenue product: the idea that you maximize your profit (minimize your cost) when the ratio of marginal revenue product to input price for all inputs is the same: \[\frac{MRP_{1}}{P_{1}} = \frac{MRP_{2}}{P_{2}} = \cdots = \frac{MRP_{n}}{P_{n}}\] That is, it’s the most important if you can apply it to […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level I Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.

If you’ve never taken the Level III CFA exam, you’re in for a real treat.  (If you’ve taken it before, you already know what I mean.)  As with the Level I and Level II exams, this exam will be six hours – three in the morning, and three in the afternoon – and it will […]

This article is for members only.  You can become a member now by purchasing a

CFA® Level III Membership

This will give you access to this and all other articles at that membership level.